'Main Idea and Purpose for Shooting an Elephant by Orwell Essay\r'

'The master(prenominal) idea of the score â€Å"Shooting an Elephant” by Orwell is the effect of the oppressor is not solo on the oppressed, except himself. There are several(prenominal) evidences found in the text to support the main idea. First, the causation mentioned about the treatment of a European woman gets when she went to bazaars alone. This explained the emancipation of security had been taken away. Since European had colonized Burma at that time, there was growing hatred toward European. Freedom to act also been seize when the teller was expected to shoot an elephant even it’s not in his wiliness.\r\nIn the story, Orwell had an inner struggle whether to knock off the elephant or not. He taught that if the elephant were kept alive, it worth at least a hundred pound. However, if it were shot dead, its tusks entirely going to worth about five pounds. Moreover, he anthropomorphized the elephant by referring ‘it’ to ‘he’. He sa id, â€Å"It seems to be that it would be murder to shoot him. ”(519) Plus, a life had been killed need to be considered and there would be possibilities that the elephant will contend again, causing damage to the village. These reasons made Orwell to question his decision.\r\nanother(prenominal) crucial reasoning that drones the vote counter to open paint a picture is his identity as an Imperialist that control sheik Burmese. If he did not kill the elephant as the villagers expected, he would be viewed as a coward. This will that affect efforts to enforce law and coded in Burma. The narrator also described, ‘I perceived in this jiffy that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroy,” to show an imperialist had to control or act as what had been expected. These conclude an oppressor would be bear upon when taking control of others. The purpose of the text is to explicate people on the consequences of one’s act.\r\nThe auth or presented his story with hatred and fed up tones as he described how sick he was to fare the Empire. Next, he gave a metaphorical explanation on how he was set to react. He compared himself to a ‘ stab posing dummy conventionalized figure of a sahib’. Like an actor on stage, he labored to do what was expected by the ‘natives’ or audiences. In the story, the elephant also resemble the Empire top executive. As he shot the elephant, its body just altered but did not fall. After several shot, it fell to the ground. The elephant was demise but not dead. This resembled the Empire diminishing power over Burma.\r\n'